<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law Office of Lainey Feingold</title>
	<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/</link>
	<description>The Art of Accessibility</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Yahbi</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4206</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4206</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the link to the resources list. Most of the list does have to do with accessibility, but what pray tell does a pagerank checker have to do with web accessibility? Blind and disabled folks don't give a hoot what a site's pagerank is. All they care about is whether or not they can access the site without too much hassle. Plus, pagerank checkers violate google TOS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the resources list. Most of the list does have to do with accessibility, but what pray tell does a pagerank checker have to do with web accessibility? Blind and disabled folks don&#8217;t give a hoot what a site&#8217;s pagerank is. All they care about is whether or not they can access the site without too much hassle. Plus, pagerank checkers violate google TOS.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mel Pedley</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4204</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4204</guid>
					<description>WAI don't normally audit a site in this fashion. In this particular case, it was part of a practical implementation of the new guidelines (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0) to prove that they could be applied in the Real World. We do, however, have a &lt;a href="http://accessites.org/site/resources/" rel="nofollow"&gt;list of online resources&lt;/a&gt; that your friend could use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAI don&#8217;t normally audit a site in this fashion. In this particular case, it was part of a practical implementation of the new guidelines (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0) to prove that they could be applied in the Real World. We do, however, have a <a href="http://accessites.org/site/resources/" rel="nofollow">list of online resources</a> that your friend could use.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yahbi</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4203</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4203</guid>
					<description>Congrats. Nice work. This may be a stupid question, but where is it that someone can get a WAI report like the one for this site that's linked to from the index page here? I looked on the WAI site following the navigation links, but couldn't locate any info. Before anyone suggests I didn't look hard enough, I'm legally blind and use a screen reader to access sites. I'm just curious about where someone can submit a site for a WAI report because I have a sighted friend that does accessible web design and thought I'd tell him about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats. Nice work. This may be a stupid question, but where is it that someone can get a WAI report like the one for this site that&#8217;s linked to from the index page here? I looked on the WAI site following the navigation links, but couldn&#8217;t locate any info. Before anyone suggests I didn&#8217;t look hard enough, I&#8217;m legally blind and use a screen reader to access sites. I&#8217;m just curious about where someone can submit a site for a WAI report because I have a sighted friend that does accessible web design and thought I&#8217;d tell him about it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Steven Wallbank</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4189</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4189</guid>
					<description>Great work Mike Cherim, really an example for us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Mike Cherim, really an example for us all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4186</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4186</guid>
					<description>I don't remember, David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t remember, David.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4183</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4183</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by accessites: Accessites.org - Law Office of Lainey Feingold: http://bit.ly/3pAwyI...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by accessites: Accessites.org - Law Office of Lainey Feingold: <a href="http://bit.ly/3pAwyI&#8230;" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3pAwyI&#8230;</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Twitter Trackbacks for Law Office of Lainey Feingold - Accessites.org [accessites.org] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4179</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4179</guid>
					<description>[...] Law Office of Lainey Feingold - Accessites.org  accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  The Law Office of Lainey Feingold earns a Quality Design award from Accessites.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Law Office of Lainey Feingold - Accessites.org  accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  The Law Office of Lainey Feingold earns a Quality Design award from Accessites.org [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David Zemens</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4178</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4178</guid>
					<description>As always, a terrific design and look from Mike.  And also, as always, a highly accessible and standards compliant design and coding.

@Mike: I am curious about one thing if you read this comment, and this is just a subjective thing, not critical at all;  What process went into deciding on the left justified layout?  Just curious, because I am a big fan of centering the layout, but as I said, that's totally subjective.

Nice work as usual Mike.  I know you are working on other things and going in different directions, but the web world misses the monthly websites that you used to produce!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, a terrific design and look from Mike.  And also, as always, a highly accessible and standards compliant design and coding.</p>
<p>@Mike: I am curious about one thing if you read this comment, and this is just a subjective thing, not critical at all;  What process went into deciding on the left justified layout?  Just curious, because I am a big fan of centering the layout, but as I said, that&#8217;s totally subjective.</p>
<p>Nice work as usual Mike.  I know you are working on other things and going in different directions, but the web world misses the monthly websites that you used to produce!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mike Cherim</title>
		<link>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4177</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://accessites.org/site/2009/11/law-office-of-lainey-feingold/#comment-4177</guid>
					<description>Thanks guys. Certainly a very thorough, and I think fair, review. I must admit the short headings and navigation texts you mentioned are all me. I hate long ones that wrap. It's a personal thing, but the clean visual appearance of one or two short words instead of full blown --- albeit descriptive --- text appeals to the designer inside me. I don't have an issue with the breadcrumb position. It's not an oversight. It was intentional, that's why it fades out almost completely. I tried moving it out but I didn't like it as much. Sorry you don't like that one, lol. Regarding the content link color... I don't know what to say. I thought that so many folks, myself included, looked at that stuff for the whole "official" thing with the &lt;abbr title="Web Accessibility Initiative"&gt;WAI&lt;/abbr&gt; I am shocked and saddened it appears that's an oversight. I could have sworn we checked that! I will have to pick a darker color if Lainey wants me to. (That'll be on me, Lainey.)

You guys really had me going at first glance. I saw the star but I mostly noted the word "Timeless." I was thinking, &lt;em&gt;Timeless, no freaking way&lt;/em&gt;. There's no such thing as a Timeless site, I thought to myself, that's just for incentive. Anyway, I totally agree, the site doesn't have nearly enough WOW for anything like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys. Certainly a very thorough, and I think fair, review. I must admit the short headings and navigation texts you mentioned are all me. I hate long ones that wrap. It&#8217;s a personal thing, but the clean visual appearance of one or two short words instead of full blown &#8212; albeit descriptive &#8212; text appeals to the designer inside me. I don&#8217;t have an issue with the breadcrumb position. It&#8217;s not an oversight. It was intentional, that&#8217;s why it fades out almost completely. I tried moving it out but I didn&#8217;t like it as much. Sorry you don&#8217;t like that one, lol. Regarding the content link color&#8230; I don&#8217;t know what to say. I thought that so many folks, myself included, looked at that stuff for the whole &#8220;official&#8221; thing with the <abbr title="Web Accessibility Initiative">WAI</abbr> I am shocked and saddened it appears that&#8217;s an oversight. I could have sworn we checked that! I will have to pick a darker color if Lainey wants me to. (That&#8217;ll be on me, Lainey.)</p>
<p>You guys really had me going at first glance. I saw the star but I mostly noted the word &#8220;Timeless.&#8221; I was thinking, <em>Timeless, no freaking way</em>. There&#8217;s no such thing as a Timeless site, I thought to myself, that&#8217;s just for incentive. Anyway, I totally agree, the site doesn&#8217;t have nearly enough WOW for anything like that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
