On this page the following entries were made in the “Quality Awards” category. Need more? Check our Site Map.
Archive for “Quality Awards”
Wachenfeld & Golla
The Wachenfeld & Golla web site was obvious to the assigned graders that it belonged to a designer at heart. The site, while made in a blocked form like many, smoothed things out with a softness and openness we really liked — clear, clean, and well presented. It also had a fair amount of clever well-used bells and whistles. It also showed us some oversights we just didn’t like, but all-in-all, a really sweet website. Provided in two languages, we love the extra mile the developer went to make it available.
Continue reading “Wachenfeld & Golla” »
Robert’s Talk
The Robert’s Talk web site is simple and straightforward in its approach. Its main purpose and intent, as a web log, is to convey written information and give access to photo-sharing via Flickr. We found some items which concerned us, but overall it is a quality site which fulfills its mission with effective grace. The masthead image impressed us; it’s fluid in that it resizes with the rest of the site. With larger resolutions this degrades the image quality, but it is a nice feature that shows sensitivity to a vast number of users.
Continue reading “Robert’s Talk” »
TomStardust
The TomStardust site has instant appeal with its modern design, liquid layout, and functionality. It has the “look” consistent with today’s web. Clear, easy to digest, visually top-notch. It does, however, have a handful of significant shortcomings and the grades will reflect this. It was a very difficult site to grade; trying to balance the score between the goodness we saw and the problems we noted. It wasn’t easy at all.
Continue reading “TomStardust” »
FriendlyBit
The FriendlyBit web site is well-named as our first impression of it was that it is indeed a friendly site — as in user-friendly. It’s clear, concise, and pleasing to the eye. It’s not overly complex, and as a content delivery system it seems practical and generally well-done. We found a few things that bothered us, but that’s nothing new. We’re (un)paid to eye sites critically. This site does have an error that was justified upon submission..
Continue reading “FriendlyBit” »
