On this page the following entries were made in the “Quality Awards” category. Need more? Check our Site Map.
Archive for “Quality Awards”
Tyssen Design (2)
The Tyssen Design (2) site is, for lack of a better term, hot. It’s very contemporary in its design and many of its features are inline with what we see on the web nowadays. This is a re-design/re-submission and although the original design submission was nice, this one’s a lot nicer. As is normal, we found a few things which brought the score down, but it is our job.
Continue reading “Tyssen Design (2)” »
Qweos.net
The Qweos site, like its fellow Accessites-awarded brothers and sisters, has its shiny, gleaming parts right along with its slightly rusted components. It stands to reason as no site is perfect. (We’re still looking.) It’s shown here, though — awarded — and that speaks volumes as we like to remind you. Both graders assigned to this site found it enjoyable, open, and clean, and both commented that they wished they knew Spanish so they could get into it more. All-in-all, we were impressed, despite any language barriers.
Continue reading “Qweos.net” »
Accessible Web Studio
The Accessible Web Studio site is a really nice site in a number of areas. On the surface it’s all techie business, very contemporary. Under the surface it has so much going for it. So much thought was put in. If one looks one may find two significant issues, though — as reflected in the scoring — but there’s so much good stuff, that it worked out favorably for the submitter in the end. This is a good example of that nice middle area between straight accessibility and the other end (which shall not be named).
Continue reading “Accessible Web Studio” »
NatKo
The NatKo website, home of the Nationale Koordinationsstelle Tourismus, gave us smiles right from the start. It has a certain look we found welcoming. Simple but elegant in a way. It marries well that ever-elusive balance. All business, all comfort and familiarity, all-in-one. Then we ripped the top off the site and peered inside. Hmm, we discovered it was pretty neat inside too, what with its semantic build and attention to detail. Very nice, very accessible. A solid site indeed.
Continue reading “NatKo” »
