Archive for “Quality Awards”

On this page the following entries were made in the “Quality Awards” category. Need more? Check our Site Map.


Quirm.net

Posted January 23rd, 2006 by Mike Cherim

Quirm.net site The Quirm.net site is another hallmark of usable simplicity with plenty of features for accessibility. It is these features, their implementation, and the proper element use, that really make this site stand apart from others offering similar content. There were a few small items that set it back, but it scored well on some of the objective checklist items from Part II like its AA-level accessibility. Overall we were impressed, as the numbers clearly indicate.

Continue reading “Quirm.net” »


Verkehrsanwälte

Posted January 19th, 2006 by Mike Cherim

Verkehrsanwalte site We looked at the Verkehrsanwälte site and immediately two things came to mind: The first was that this was a really professional-looking site, the second thing is there were some missing closing tags. However, the second item is allowable on an HTML 4.01 Strict site. Moreover, it also showed us that this developer really understood the rules. All in all, this website is sizable, complex yet precise, and quite impressive. A new high scorer, in fact, coming tantalizingly close to one of our top-level awards.

Continue reading “Verkehrsanwälte” »


Noteworthy

Posted January 17th, 2006 by Mike Cherim

Noteworthy site The Noteworthy site was debated on various points as realized by viewing the worksheets submitted by our expert graders, but there were some common-ground high points. The most prominent of these was the site’s build quality. The word “solid” was brought up more than once and that was this site’s biggest merit. The general design aspect was also graded favorably. All in all we like this site and feel it exemplifies well that which we seek. To date, this is now our highest-scoring submission.

Continue reading “Noteworthy” »


Train 2000

Posted January 11th, 2006 by Mike Cherim

Train 2000 site The Train 2000 web site speaks of its purpose as soon as you land on it. It says: “Hello, I’m an attractive website but don’t let that fool you, I’m hard at work here.” That’s what we thought, anyway. Train 2000 looks good, pleasing, respectful to its visitors, but underneath is where it really shines. Sure we found some stuff, but this is a well thought out site with a really open feel and dedicated purpose. Oh, and it’s really quite accessible which its users are bound to appreciate. To date, this is our highest-scoring submission.

Continue reading “Train 2000” »




Note: This is the end of the usable page. The image(s) below are preloaded for performance only.